A few years later: (1) UJA was done, merged into what would become JFNA and made to disappear; and (2) the legitimate Budget process that was, was no longer, it, too, has disappeared. And, now, a budget Fugazi is upon us.
I have served on Budget Committees from my first service on a local Chicago Agency Board through the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago the UJA, the CJF, JFNA, UIA, JAFI and a few more. Even Chaired a bunch of them, and, at all levels, always...always...with the best of professional partners at every level. Yes, I was often in the room where it happened. I have been proud of the changes that Budget Chairs at the Jewish Agency like Richie Pearlstone and Jay Sarver implemented to move those Budgets from the opaque to the transparent, changes that I'm certain current JAFI Budget Chair Beth Leonard, a superstar accountant in her real job, has perpetuated, even further enhanced.
At my own federation, and, most probably yours, we have had that transparency from long before my time in leadership through the present day and into the future. Great professional leadership and a dedicated and demanding laity require no less. No national or international non-profit that I have seen at work spent/spends as much of its time on budget.
All of the above is but prologue...and leads me to the JFNA Budget just approved.
First, the Expense and Revenue Budget was presented on 4-1/2 pages --a $48.1 million Budget on 4-1/2 pages. Oh, there was also an accompanying brief Memo from the CEO on the Budget. Nowhere, other than in a $3.1 Million "Provision for Contingency" is there even a suggestion that the federations, the system, are in extremis as a result of the shutdowns dictated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Budget as presented, as approved, is so opaque that were it presented by another non-profit, it would have been rejected, marked "return to sender." I ask, in all sincerity, how could this Budget in this form and with its lack of substance been submitted to the federations let alone approved with undue haste in the extreme circumstances that confront every community today? How could the JFNA Budget & Finance Committee and, then, the JFNA Board and members proceed as if it's "business as usual" when business is not and may never be "usual" ever again and certainly not in FY 2020/2021.
At the merger and for the first years thereafter, under a succession of Budget and Finance Chairs and two strong Chief Financial Officers and 3 CEOs who came with exceptional federation CEO experiences, the JFNA Budget process was the equal of those cited above. Then, JFNA's Budget was coopted by a CEO with no federation Budget experience, who, with Budget Chairs, if the evidence is to be believed, demonstrated a "leave it to the JFNA professionals" attitude and, as explored on so many of these pages over the years, allowed the annual Budget to be treated as but a "framework;" not one that bound the organization to operate within it -- the organization's revenues began to be treated as an ATM -- just insert your CEO cash card and withdraw funds for whatever purpose, no Board action necessary. Hopefully Board Chair Mark Wilf and CEO Eric Fingerhut have assured that this malpractice will not happen again...emphasis on "hopefully."
And, yet...
At a time of the worst financial calamity to impact on the Jewish communal system -- locally, nationally and worldwide -- with JFNA taking on some distribution of allocated funds, the Budget fails woefully to set forth how JFNA plans to meet the crisis in any substantive manner. As one of my mentors wrote me after reviewing this "budget:"
"No mention of a US Jewish community rescue 'package' to enable federations to provide real value to JCCs, synagogues, etc. What a great national campaign opportunity..."Someone out there write me, please, and explain to me JFNA's plans for meeting the catastrophic circumstances our institutions now face.
Smart people, lay and professional, worked on this Budget; yet, this thing fails to reflect those smarts. I would suggest that JFNA immediately convene the totality of federation leadership by Zoom or, if safe to do so, in person to develop and approve a Continental Special Campaign. I would even go so far as to suggest that Joel Tauber, who chaired UJA during a significant part of the historic Operation Exodus Campaign, be appointed the Special Campaign Chair. and get on with ther task.
The hour is already late.
Rwexler
I am a past member of the JFNA budget committee. We were never a committee, we were an audience. I asked a question and the reply was to wait until the end of the presentation. So, I waited. As soon as the presentation was completed by the great professional, the chairman made a motion to accept the budget. I then asked my two questions. The CEO of a major Federation serving as professional shill on the committee responded that this is not the place to ask questions. And the budget was approved and lunch was served.
ReplyDeleteThe professional approached me to respond to one of my questions. He said, well of course we know we won’t receive 100% of the dues budgeted, but we won’t admit to that because it gives a license to Federations not to fully pay their dues. I asked then what happens to the expense budget with less income? His response was that the budget was well padded from the outset and that the CEO just cuts whatever he feels like cutting.
So much for lay involvement or decision making. So much for transparency. For that matter, so much for honesty and integrity.
But let’s be honest, today, frankly almost nobody really gives a Federation Rats Ass what JFNA does or doesn’t do. The Federations support and pay their dues because they know they can’t survive the negative impact of losing participation in... the Lion of Judah. More than anything else.
Create an independent Lion of Judah and maybe a Young Leadership Cabinet and Federations would cut their dues by far more than half.
Richard, losing participation in Lion of Judah is a deterrent to cutting JFNA dues in a crisis situation that we are in?
ReplyDeleteAre you seriously telling us that if Chicago a) Told JFNA that they were going to cut their dues for 2021 by 50% and b) JFNA told Chicago if they did that, their Lions of Judah would no longer, what? Not be allowed to wear their Lion pins? Attend the Lion of Judah conference, whenever the next one will be? Not be allowed to communicate with their national and international network of Lions that they have established over the years?
Come on, JFNA doesn't have the heft anymore, not that it ever did.
Of course the budget is a farce, in process,in transparency and in content.
ReplyDeleteThere appears to be no lay leadership that cares enough to do anything about it, it isn't on the LCE's agenda and the professional JFNA leadership have a vested interest in the status quo (The latter evidently are the only ones that really care - about their obscenely inflated salaries, prestige and power).
The result will be forced upon the everyone involved when the income stream begins to falter. Instead of proactive aggressive change and reform to prevent the the fire, the powers that be are simply waiting for organization to burst into flames.
The problem is that they have no insurance and will soon experience a total loss.
They will all no doubt claim "natural disaster" and that it isn't their fault.
What ever happened to accountability?
What about fudicial responsibility?
Does anybody care anymore?
Chicago buries its dues in its overseas allocations. Always has. Transparent?!? Tranparency is in the eyes of the beholder.
ReplyDeleteThe practice of including JFNA dues in the "Israel and Overseas" category is a disservice to Israel and Overseas and to local lay leadership. It inflates perceived I&O funding and hides the dues from sight so that it takes a lot if digging for folks to know how much cash they are wasting on a worthless umbrella organization.
ReplyDeleteThe practice is widespread and should be stopped immediately.
Probably also problematic in terms of the IRS and Charity Navigator
ReplyDelete