Tuesday, November 15, 2011

HEROES AND HYPOCRISY

JFNA's wholly unnecessary often silly now annual Community Heroes program has, or if JFNA had any institutional sense, proved to be an annual embarrassment. And, not just because the "winners" have so not represented the federated communities and not just because there has been ballot box stuffing. It's because Heroes has been (from the beginning) a "game" without rules.


This year, an activist who can best be described as emerging out of an organization whose stridency can be charitably described as anti-Israel pro-divestment, pro-sanction, pro-boycott was nominated as a "Community Hero.". Having no criteria for who might be a nominee, JFNA applied its unilateral judgement and removed the nominee from consideration. (Should there not have been some disqualifying criteria, set in advance? Duh.) Friends reminded me that in the first year of Heroes they had nominated me, that I was doing quite well in the voting as a matter of fact, when, presto-changeo, I was no longer on the ballot. So, at least two criteria seem to apply: if you are out of favor with JFNA, you are out; and if your organizational support comes from those who are out of step with the JFNA/system's message on Israel, you're out as well.


Let's carry this a little further. Peter Beinart was a/the featured speaker at last week's desultory General Assembly. Beinart, the estimable CUNY Associate Professor, who has begun a significant second career bashing American Jewish organizational leadership and the Israeli Government, has published, among other trash, The Failure of the American Jewish Establishment. Contrary to actual research findings, Beinart has concluded that Jewish young People have distanced themselves from "right wing, anti-liberal" Israel, yada yada yada. He embraces the message of Shulamit Aloni, Avrum Burg and others of that ilk. I would assume, given the actions taken to remove a woman organizational leader from Heroes consideration because of an alleged anti-Israel message; Beinart, were he nominated, would be removed as well. Or maybe not. Hypocrisy runs amok.

But...this hypocrisy didn't end with Beinart. Columnist Caroline Glick, a Jerusalem Post editor, with whom readers of these Posts know I often violently disagree, blogged after the GA Jewish American Community in Danger (November 11). She not only cited Beinart's GA appearance but that as well of "...the Boston Globe's resident anti-Israel  columnist James Carroll" and she condemned the organization "...which presented several panels discussing whether anti-Zionists should be embraced by the community..." But, then she got it wrong when she wrote: "But who among the well-funded American Jewish leadership has the courage to tell these young people (who chose these speakers) that they are deranged?" It was not "young people" who chose these speakers -- it was the professional leaders of JFNA. Those who should know better...don't. And the lay leadership of JFNA and this GA -- busy thanking everyone for "the great GA."

I suggested in the midst of the first Heroes exercise that JFNA promulgate standards for the nominees. A silly suggestion when having no standards allows JFNA the power (dearly loved by those now in power) to remove candidates at will. Why give that up? I have a better suggestion, give up on this entire futile Heroes thing. And, given the speakers at this year's GA, shame on all of us for doing nothing.

Last week Peter Beinart headlined the JFNA General Assembly. His appearance was deemed so important it merited an interview on the GA Daily Report. And the annual Heroes fiasco continues. Please discuss and report on what our system has gained from this annual waste.

This is Emperor's New Clothes stuff. So terribly sad.

Rwexler

6 comments:

  1. They say that a boat is nothing more than a hole in the ocean to throw money into. Add these wasteful things and throw in Tribefest and we have an entire ocean liner. Not bad.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Caroline Glick is a non-responsible journalist who makes up facts, in purpose. She admitted to it, more than once.
    That said, I think that Beinart is a different story - he is even more dangerous because he hasn't said so...

    ReplyDelete
  3. What Beinart has been saying isn't exactly new, but it's an entirely legit point of view.

    Beinart himself is, and has surely been, an active, observant member of the Jewish community. He is also an "old school" Zionist in the mold of Ben Gurion and many other founders of the country.

    The problem with too many right wingers today (who apparently have gotten into the good graces of Mr. Wexler on this subject) is that they have the arrogance to purport who is "pro-Israel" and to deny that right to all others.

    Being pro-ZOA or pro-Likud may be one way of being pro-Israel, but hardly the only one.

    Speaking of which, Mr. Wexler, what about this new discussion of foreign aid being promoted by most Republican presidential candidates? That's something that JFNA, AIPAC and of course ZOA (which would have been first in line had Obama mentioned this) should be all over....but instead, the silence is deafening.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Richard, re: the last Anonymous' remarks: I'm not sure you want this blog to become the place for this type of misguided and misinformed discussion - however, if you are, let me know - I'm ready :-)

    ReplyDelete
  5. I am SO glad you're back. That having been said, regarding the Heroes contest, they'll only remove you if you're getting lots of votes. Max Blumenthal, an anti-Israel activist recently pictured in the Occupy the Occupiers video bum rushing a Birthright Israel Alumni event in NY, was nominated and never got yanked because he only managed a handful of votes. Leah Rubashkin is a finalist as the culmination of a Chabad campaign to whitewash her family's criminal activity in the Agriprocessors scandal/chilul Hashem. But that's ok I guess. Don't want to piss of the mashiach now do we...

    As for Beinart, I was amazed that such a person could be invited to the GA. His findings regarding young Jews and their declining support for Israel seem to be more the product of wishful thinking than of actual fact. But who knows, maybe they'll invite Max Blumenthal to TribeFest?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Re Peter Beinart op-ed and Haaretz saying July-14-2020 he doesn't go far enough.

    It's a club where whoever screams louder the A. slur, thinks is more special.
    Don't be fooled by phrasing it as suggestions. The term "liberal Zionists" has become more and more of an empty title.

    What all these "thinkers" won't divulge, is pragmatism. Since it doesn't make bumber-stickers. Or headline grabbing.

    There are many Israelis , who are--ready for this cliche?--concerned about life, survival. And don't put much thought or concerned into Zionism as ideology.
    This is not to say they deny historic ties to the land.
    Do these writers deny legitimate worry of entities (moderate or radical Apartheid Arab Palestine) that incite for, justify even glorify killing of Jews in Israel? Are they totally blind to genocidal Islamic Republic that doesn't even share any border, yet has its bloody hands full at the border and inside Israel?

    Want real pragmatic suggestions?
    Begin reforming 'Palestinian' education, as a start.

    ReplyDelete