Monday, June 22, 2009

6 WEEKS AND COUNTING

As we counted the Omer up to Shavuot, since May 8, when Rieger/Kanfer/Manning announced the arrival "...in five weeks" of 25 Yemenite Jewish families in Monsey, New York, as a result of the UJC-Satmar partnership, we have been counting down the days to their arrival. It was on May 8, you recall, that UJC's current leaders sent a bill to each federation asking for a commitment to fund a pro rata portion of the "reduced cost" of $800,000 -- the "ask" to each federation scaled to its Annual Campaign (or something). Now, this entire Folly was never and has been never approved by the owners...but, so it goes. In fact, this type of "decision-making" never stops. At its June 8 Board meeting, not a mention of the relocation of Yemeni Jews -- not on the Agenda, not in Howard Rieger's recitation of "his" accomplishments.

Much like its own Budget -- which cannot be fully funded given the number of federations which have not paid their Dues, some dating back to 2007, growing each year since -- federations have not stepped forward with enthusiasm to fund a relocation...well, let me spell it out the way in which the World Zionist Organization expressed it on June 2: "...there is no dispute over (the Yemenis)...right to decide to be absorbed any place else in the world, but the concerted effort that was made in this instance by the UJC appears not to be in keeping with the patterns of conduct that were established in the Jewish Agency by its partners over many years." UJC has not responded to the WZO...it moves forward with the Satmar as its partner as it once did with JAFI and the Joint; it hides behind a terrific philanthropist, Monsey's and the UJA-Federation of New York's Yis Schulman. And what happens if the $800,000 is not raised? Seems like a logical question.

The WZO continued: "The fact that the UJC decided to get involved without discussing the issue with the partners in the Jewish Agency undermines the foundations of the partnership and Zionist character of the Jewish Agency for Israel. The WZO demands that UJC stop this initiative..." And UJC has not responded -- it never does.

But the Jews of Yemen have responded. The Jewish Agency announced here in Jerusalem as its Assembly and Board of Governors are meeting that 16 Yemeni Jews arrived here, their home...our home for them...in fulfillment of part of the Zionist imperative. Some, I am told, were on the list of those whom UJC planned with its "partner" to relocate in Monsey.

It one week ago, on Monday June 15, on jpost.com, Haviv Rettig Gur, the Post's insightful reporter on, among other things, Diaspora matters, published a lengthy interview with Yis Schulman in which Schulman, philanthropist and a member of the Monsey community, decried the "rumor mill" that created the impression that these families are "...moving into an anti-Zionist community..." citing the involvement of, among others, the U.S. State Department, HIAS, FEGS and the Rockland County Jewish Federation (whose Dues payments to UJC may have ceased) beyond the Satmar, and that this relocation is of those who "chose to come here." At the very end of a long interview, Rettig Gur quotes "a former Jewish Agency employee in North America:" "In the past, Jews from Yemen who opted to go to Monsey were absorbed in the Satmar community. There may be a few exceptions,but the vast majority are Satmar today. The intentions of this project and the final result are two very different things."

So Yemeni Jews are coming to Israel to join the 1000's of Jews from Yemen who preceded them and who will now nuture them here in the homeland of the Jewish People. Oh, and six weeks (not five) have passed since UJC stated with certainty that the Yemenite Jews would be delivered to Monsey by this date. And almost three months since the date on which Howard Rieger in his original panic-stricken Memo on the subject projected...Never mind.

Rwexler

2 comments:

  1. Did it ever occur to you that the reason that UJC isn't advertising the date of the departure from Yemin to USA is because it's a secret, the disclosure of which would further put these Jewish lives at risk? There was no prior disclosure on the timing of this week's 3 families arrival in Israel. Why do you think that was, Dick?

    Press reports even indicated that the only reason that the Sochnut commented on their liberation was because an Arab news service disclosed it.

    Dick, why do you insist on trying to incite terrorists in Yemin to murder these Jews, by further publicizing these matters? Will you need blood on your hands before you realize that your noble efforts to destroy UJC et al, should have some limits? Keyboards don't kill people, bloggers do. Have you no self-control? Please keep your trap shut on this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear "Rose" -- here it goes again. UJC sends a mass mailing out on May 8, following their Briefings, articles on the subject appear in the JTA, the UJC sends Briefings on the matter ,,, and you choose to point a finger accusing this Blog of being guilty of commiting a blood libel, putting Jewish lives at risk, inciting terrorists, blllod on my hands, etc.

    Sounds, so UJC Pearlie. Why not just resend the Anonymous accusations of similar screed that followed my earlier Posts?

    "Keyboardss don't kill people, bloggers do" is worthy of Bartlett's.

    Remember, Rosie, it was UJC's incompetency that started this all.

    ReplyDelete